Central Coast District Championship

Round 5 Results

 1 Curtis, John     2261 [4]      1:0    Clark, Neil     1340 [3]  
 2 Frias, Joe       1469 [2]      1:0    Pascoe, John L  1437 [3]  
 3 Farrell, Keith R 1292 [2.5]    =:=    Crevar, Paul    1115 [2]  
 4 Russell, Paul    1067 [2]      0:1    Losh, Gary      1470 [2]  
 5 Robinson, Allen  1515 [1.5]    0:1    Howells, Colin  1089 [1.5]
 6 Hogan, Keith     1310 [2]      1:0    Bassett, Duncan 1182 [1.5]
 7 Russell, Michael 1127 [1]      1:0    Alvarez, Ramon  1103 [1]  
 8 Russell, Gary    1114 [1]      0:1    Hoseman, Bill   1063 [1]
I thank Michael Russell and Keith Hogan for playing their deferred game from round 3.

Round 6 Pairings

as always - circumstances permitting ! 
 1 Losh, Gary      1470 [3]       :     Curtis, John     2261 [5]  
 2 Clark, Neil     1340 [3]       :     Farrell, Keith R 1292 [3]  
 3 Pascoe, John L  1437 [3]       :     Hogan, Keith     1310 [3]  
 4 Crevar, Paul    1115 [2.5]     :     Frias, Joe       1469 [3]  
 5 Howells, Colin  1089 [2.5]     :     Russell, Michael 1127 [2]  
 6 Hoseman, Bill   1063 [2]       :     Russell, Paul    1067 [2]  
 7 Alvarez, Ramon  1103 [1]       :     Robinson, Allen  1515 [1.5]
 8 Bassett, Duncan 1182 [1.5]     :     Russell, Gary    1114 [1]


Standings at the start of round 6

Six on equal Second - 2 rounds to go ! ! !
Place Name             Loc  Score

  1   Curtis, John     2261 5    
 2-7  Pascoe, John L   1437 3    
      Clark, Neil      1340 3    
      Hogan, Keith     1310 3    
      Losh, Gary       1470 3    
      Farrell, Keith R 1292 3    
      Frias, Joe       1469 3    
 8-9  Crevar, Paul     1115 2.5  
      Howells, Colin   1089 2.5  
10-12 Russell, Paul    1067 2    
      Russell, Michael 1127 2    
      Hoseman, Bill    1063 2    
13-14 Bassett, Duncan  1182 1.5  
      Robinson, Allen  1515 1.5  
15-17 Alvarez, Ramon   1103 1    
      Russell, Gary    1114 1    
      Morgan, Ken      1096 1

Crosstable

No Name             Loc  Total  1    2    3    4    5    6 

1  Curtis, John     2261 5     11:1  4:1 10:1  2:1  3:1  5:
2  Pascoe, John L   1437 3      6:  16:1  3:1  1:0  7:0  4:
3  Clark, Neil      1340 3      8:1 15:1  2:0  7:1  1:0  6:
4  Hogan, Keith     1310 3      5:1  1:0 11:1  9:0 13:1  2:
5  Losh, Gary       1470 3      4:0  8:= 15:1  6:= 10:1  1:
6  Farrell, Keith R 1292 3      2:0 12:1 13:1  5:=  8:=  3:
7  Frias, Joe       1469 3     15:0  9:1 16:1  3:0  2:1  8:
8  Crevar, Paul     1115 2.5    3:0  5:=  9:= 15:1  6:=  7:
9  Howells, Colin   1089 2.5   10:0  7:0  8:=  4:1 14:1 11:
10 Russell, Paul    1067 2      9:1 17:+  1:0  0:   5:0 12:
11 Russell, Michael 1127 2      1:0 14:1  4:0  0:  15:1  9:
12 Hoseman, Bill    1063 2     17:0  6:0 14:0  0:1 16:1 10:
13 Bassett, Duncan  1182 1.5    0:   0:1  6:0 14:=  4:0 16:
14 Robinson, Allen  1515 1.5   16:0 11:0 12:1 13:=  9:0 15:
15 Alvarez, Ramon   1103 1      7:1  3:0  5:0  8:0 11:0 14:
16 Russell, Gary    1114 1     14:1  2:0  7:0  0:  12:0 13:
17 Morgan, Ken      1096 1     12:1 10:-  0:   0:   0:   0:

Performance

No  Name             Loc  Score Exp. Chg*K  Rav Rprfm

1.  Curtis, John     2261 5.0/5 5.00     0 1256  2255
2.  Robinson, Allen  1515 1.5/5 4.60   -46 1115   966
3.  Losh, Gary       1470 3.0/5 4.25   -19 1177  1249
4.  Frias, Joe       1469 3.0/5 4.05   -16 1217  1289
5.  Clark, Neil      1340 3.0/5 1.60    21 1477  1549
6.  Farrell, Keith R 1292 3.0/5 2.75     4 1253  1325
7.  Morgan, Ken      1096 1.0/1 0.55     7 1063  2062
8.  Russell, Michael 1127 2.0/4 0.28    25 1547  1547
9.  Russell, Gary    1114 1.0/4 0.72     4 1371  1178
10. Hogan, Keith     1310 3.0/5 1.70    19 1426  1498
11. Alvarez, Ramon   1103 1.0/5 1.20    -3 1304  1064
12. Crevar, Paul     1115 2.5/5 1.55    15 1259  1259
13. Howells, Colin   1089 2.5/5 1.20    19 1295  1295
14. Hoseman, Bill    1063 1.0/4 1.00     0 1254  1061
15. Russell, Paul    1067 1.0/3 0.09    13 1607  1482
16. Pascoe, John L   1437 2.0/4 1.40     9 1546  1546
17. Bassett, Duncan  1182 0.5/3 0.75    -4 1372  1099


Ettalong Championship

Round 3 Results

the game Neil-Keith was actually adjourned - Keith was involved in a non-chess protest meeting 
 1 Neil Clark      1340 [2]     .5:.5   Keith R Farrell 1292 [2]  
 2 Bill Hoseman    1053 [1.5]    0:1    Joe Frias       1469 [1.5]
 3 Ramon Alvarez   1250 [1.5]    0:1    Adrian McInnes  1262 [1]  
 4 Barry Shearwood 1260 [1]      1:0    David Burrell   706  [1]  
 5 Lorraine Cobban 564  [1]      1:0    Gus Divitini    966  [1]  
 6 Joe Simpson     1150 [0]      0:1    Damir Matasin   1335 [.5] 
 7 Frank Savetta   502  [0]      1:0    Craig Longfield 757  [0]

Round 6 Pairings

as always - circumstances permitting ! 
 1 Joe Frias       1469 [2.5]     :     Neil Clark      1340 [2.5]
 2 Keith R Farrell 1292 [2.5]     :     Barry Shearwood 1260 [2]  
 3 Adrian McInnes  1262 [2]       :     Lorraine Cobban 564  [2]  
 4 Bill Hoseman    1053 [1.5]     :     Ramon Alvarez   1250 [1.5]
 5 Damir Matasin   1335 [1.5]     :     Gus Divitini    966  [1]  
 6 David Burrell   706  [1]       :     Joe Simpson     1150 [0]  
 7 Marion          500  [0]       :     Frank Savetta   502  [1]  
 8 Craig Longfield 757  [0]      1:0    BYE

Crosstable

No Name             Total  1    2    3    4  

1  Clark, Neil      2.5   15:W  6:W  3:D  2: 
2  Frias, Joe       2.5    7:D  4:W  8:W  1: 
3  Farrell, Keith R 2.5   11:W 10:W  1:D  4: 
4  Shearwood, Barry 2      5:W  2:L 10:W  3: 
5  Cobban, Lorraine 2      4:L  0:W 11:W  6: 
6  McInnes, Adrian  2     12:W  1:L  7:W  5: 
7  Alvarez, Ramon   1.5    2:D  9:W  6:L  8: 
8  Hoseman, Bill    1.5    9:D 15:W  2:L  7: 
9  Matasin, Damir   1.5    8:D  7:L 15:W 11: 
10 Burrell, David   1      0:W  3:L  4:L 15: 
11 Divitini, Gus    1      3:L 12:W  5:L  9: 
12 Longfield, Craig 1      6:L 11:L 13:   0:W
13 Savetta, Frank   1      0:   0:  12:W 14: 
14 , Marion         0      0:   0:   0:  13: 
15 Simpson, Joe     0      1:L  8:L  9:L 10: 


No  Name             Loc  Score Exp. Chg*K  Rav Rprfm

1.  Frias, Joe       1469 2.5/3 2.52     0 1188  1461
2.  Clark, Neil      1340 2.5/3 1.92     6 1235  1508
3.  Matasin, Damir   1335 1.5/3 2.22    -7 1151  1151
4.  Farrell, Keith R 1292 2.5/3 2.52     0 1004  1277
5.  McInnes, Adrian  1262 2.0/3 2.10    -1 1116  1241
6.  Shearwood, Barry 1260 2.0/3 2.67    -7  913  1038
7.  Alvarez, Ramon   1250 1.5/3 1.08     4 1355  1355
8.  Simpson, Joe     1150 0.0/3 1.11   -11 1243   244
9.  Hoseman, Bill    1053 1.5/3 0.54    10 1318  1318
10. Divitini, Gus    966  1.0/3 1.89    -9  871   746
11. Longfield, Craig 757  0.0/2 0.22    -2 1114   115
12. Cobban, Lorraine 564  1.0/2 0.06     9 1113  1113
13. Burrell, David   706  0.0/2 0.04     0 1276   277
14. Savetta, Frank   502  1.0/1 0.19     8  757  1756
15. , Marion         500                      0     0

(1) Lasker,Emanuel - Steinitz,William [C75]
Hastings Hastings (9), 1895
[note by Keith Farrell]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 d6 5.0-0 Nge7 6.c3 Bd7 7.d4 Ng6 8.Re1 Be7 9.Nbd2 0-0 10.Nf1 Qe8 11.Bc2 Kh8 12.Ng3 Bg4 13.d5 Nb8 14.h3 Bc8 15.Nf5 Bd8 16.g4 Ne7 17.Ng3 Ng8 Diagram

Steinitz - an explorer of chess principles, who sometimes pushed the envelope too far 18.Kg2 Nd7 19.Be3 Nb6 20.b3 Bd7 21.c4 Nc8 22.Qd2 Nce7 23.c5 g6 24.Qc3 f5 25.Nxe5 dxe5 26.Qxe5+ Nf6 27.Bd4 fxg4 28.hxg4 Bxg4 29.Qg5 Qd7 30.Bxf6+ Kg8 31.Bd1 Bh3+ 32.Kg1 Nxd5 33.Bxd8 Nf4 34.Bf6 Qd2 35.Re2 Nxe2+ 36.Bxe2 Qd7 37.Rd1 Qf7 38.Bc4 Be6 39.e5 Bxc4 40.Nf5 1-0

(2) Edward Lasker - George Alan Thomas [A40]
London, England London, England, 1912
[note by Keith Farrell]

1.d4 e6 2.Nf3 f5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.Bxf6 Bxf6 6.e4 fxe4 7.Nxe4 b6 8.Ne5 0-0 9.Bd3 Bb7 10.Qh5 Qe7?? Diagram

allowing a checkmate in 8 moves - and mate with a piece that never moves - or is that too much of a hint ? 11.Qxh7+ Kxh7 12.Nxf6+ Kh6 13.Neg4+ Kg5 14.h4+ Kf4 15.g3+ Kf3 16.Be2+ Kg2 17.Rh2+ Kg1 Diagram

white to checkmate in one 18.Kd2# 1-0

(3) Howells,Colin (1089) - Hogan,Keith (1310) [A43]
Gosford District 2009 Hastings (4), 07.07.2009
[notes by Colin]

1.d4 c5 2.dxc5 Qa5+ 3.Nc3 Qxc5 Black doesn't need to recapture immediately. Instead Black can play; 3...Nf6 4. Nf3,Nc6 5.Nd2,Qxc5 (K.Smith 2395 - W.Browne 2530, San Antonio IT) and Black has achieved equality. 4.Be3! This awkward looking move gains an important tempo, claims the initiative and hints at White's plan, 5.Rb1, 6.Nf3, 7.g3 and finally 8.Bg3 with alot of pressure on the Queenside due to the exposed Black Queen. 4...Qb4 5.Rb1 Nf6 6.a3 Also to gain tempo. 6...Qa5 7.Nf3 Nc6 8.g3 e5 9.Bg2 d5 Sensing the potential danger on the long diagonal, Black attempts to create a "dam" to block the bishop. White doesn't hesitate on exploiting his advantage in development and increases the pressure on the Queenside. 10.b4 Qxa3? Diagram

Black underestimates White's activity, not even sensing the continuation to follow. Better was 10...Qd8 11.Rb3! Qa6 12.b5 Qa5 13.bxc6 bxc6 14.Nxe5! White refuses to let up the pressure and proceeds to dismantle Black's pawn centre, clearing the way for the two bishops on e3 and g2. 14...c5 15.Qd2 Qa1+ Diagram

Black cracks under the pressure and egages in an illusory attack which is refuted instantly. 16.Rb1 Qa3 17.Nxd5 Winning the exchange. White activates the Bishop on g2 with devastating effect. 17...Bd6 (guarding the c7 square from mate in 2) loses to a forced mate in 7 after 18.Nxf6+,gxf6 19.Qxd6,Qa5+ 20.Kd1,Qd2+ 21.Kxd2,Be6 22.Bc6+,Bd7 23.Qxd7+,Kf8 24.Qxf7# 17...Qa2?? 18.Nc7+ resigns Black cannot avoid mate after 18...Ke7 19. Nc6# 1-0

(4) Robinson,Allen - Russell,Gary [C34]
Gosford District 2009 Hastings (1), 17.06.2009
[notes by Gary, and where noted - Keith Farrel]

notes by Gary - except those marked 'kf' being Keith Farrell's 1.e4 e5 2.f4 Alan always plays King's Gambit: here I delibrately take the gambit, which Alan was not expecting 2...exf4 3.Nf3 d6 the knight was expected. d6 is played to prevent Ne5, but now I need to defend pawn at f4 4.Bc4 Be6 the idea is to stop the attack on f7 5.Bxe6 fxe6 not what I expected, but at least I can move e6 to e5 next turn 6.d4 Nc6 d4 wrecked my chance to move pawn to e5. Instead I gamble with my knight. During this time, I am very vunerable on kings side 7.Bxf4 Be7 lost the pawn. maybe in hindsight, I should have moved g5 instead of Nc6 8.0-0 g5? missing an x-ray tactic - kf 9.Nxg5 Bxg5 Diagram

10.Qh5+ Kd7 at this point, I thought I had lost the game 11.Bxg5 Nge7 12.Rf7 h6 I was waiting for this rook move. The pawn was offered as a sacrifice, hoping to prevent his queen from moving 13.Bxe7 [13.Bf6] 13...Nxe7 14.Nc3 Qg8 I was expecting the knight move to free up his other rook. My queen move was to enable my other rook to join the fight 15.Qb5+ Kd8 I was expecting this, but felt it was the worst of two evils with Ra f1 threatened. The Kd8 was done instead of Kc8, to protect my knight, and keep pressure on his rook 16.Qxb7?! [16.Raf1 being preferable - kf] 16...Qxf7 17.Qxa8+ I decided to go for the rook swap, but I wonder if it was better not to 17...Nc8 18.Rf1 now I fear his knight moving to b5, and his queen to either b7 or c6, which means I need my queen to guard c7 18...Qg7 19.Nb5 time for a double attack: d4+ [the threat protects against his knight taking a7] or g2++ [with support from rook to come 19...Rg8 20.g3 it's getting serious near c7, but I thought I would give Alan something else to think about. Alan won't do Nxa7, as I will go Qxd4+ pinning his knight. 20...h5 quite lame, but I thought an attack on his pawn would be fun. I can't afford to move my queen as it protects two strands of attack 21.Nxa7?? Diagram

I thought this was a mistake [21.c3 as the knight is needed to support the d-pawn] 21...Qxd4+ 22.Kg2 at this stage, I have to either keep Alan in check, or lose my rook with his QxN+, Ke7 followed by QxR 22...Qxa7 23.Qxa7 Nxa7 now I'm in the ascendancy, if I can hold it together 24.Rf6 Kd7 25.Rh6 Rg4 pawn for a pawn 26.Rxh5 Rxe4 27.Rh7+ Kc6 28.h4 at this stage, I do not want to do a rook swap, as he is two pawns up, against my knight; I probably would be the loser on the deal 28...Re2+ 29.Kf3 Rxc2 30.h5 Rxb2 31.Re7 Kd5 I should have moved pawn to e5, or even Rxh2 32.h6 Nc6 33.h7 Rh2 34.Rxc7 Ne5+ 35.Kf4 Ng6+ 36.Ke3 [36.Kg5 Nf8 37.Rf7 Nxh7+ 38.Kg6 e5 39.a4 Kc5 40.g4 e4 41.g5 e3 42.Re7] 36...Nf8 37.a4 Rxh7 my king has time to intercept the a-pawn 38.Rxh7 Nxh7 39.Kf4 e5+ 40.Kf5 e4 41.a5 Nf8 the knight has time to move across and take 42.a6 Nd7 43.a7 Nb6 44.Kf4 Kd4 the race with the pawn 45.g4 e3 46.Kf3 Kd3 47.g5 e2 white resigns 0-1

(5) Howells,Colin - Rowlison,Colin [D52]
Gosford Summer 2009 Hastings (1), 03.02.2009
[notes by Colin Howells and where noted Keith]

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 d5 3.c4 e6 4.Nc3 Bd6 5.Bg5 c6 6.e3 0-0 7.Bd3 Nbd7 8.0-0 Re8 9.e4 dxe4 10.Nxe4 Be7 11.Re1 Nxe4 Diagram

12.Bxe7 Qxe7 13.Bxe4 Nf6 14.Bd3 Qd6 15.c5 Qc7 16.Ne5 Diagram

16...Qe7 17.Re3 Bd7 18.Qe2 b6 19.b4 a5 20.a4 Nd5?? allows 'the Greek Gift sacrifice' - wikipedia has a good article on it, I reproduce here the games it mentions - kf the games are Colle-O'Hanlon, Lasker-Bauer (a double-Bishop sac) and an early effort from me 21.Bxh7+! Kxh7?? 22.Rh3+ Kg8 23.Qd3?? [23.Qh5!! Qh4 computers will do -anything- to delay mate - kf 24.Rxh4 Bc8 25.Qxf7#] 23...g6 24.Qd2 g5 25.Qd3 Nf6 26.f4 Kf8?? 27.fxg5 Ne4 28.Qxe4 f5 29.Rf1 Diagram

[29.gxf6 while the text is strong this line leads directly to mate 29...Qxf6 30.Rh8+ Qxh8 31.Qf3+ Qf6 (31...Ke7 32.Qf7+ Kd8 33.Qxd7#) 32.Qxf6+ Kg8 33.Qg6+ Kh8 34.Nf7#] 29...Qxg5? 30.Nxd7+ Ke7?? [while 30...Kf7 31.Rh7+ Kg6 is 'not as terrible' a position] 31.Rh7+ Kd8 32.cxb6 although not strictly the strongest, this sacrifice has been well prepared for [32.Qxc6 is crushing also - and mate is unavoidable 32...Qe3+ 33.Kh1 Qe4 34.Qxb6+ Kc8 35.Nf8 threatening multiple mates leaving only mate-delaying moves 35...Ra7 36.Rxa7 Re7 37.Rxe7 Qxg2+ 38.Kxg2 f4 39.Re8#] 32...fxe4 33.b7 Qg4 34.Kh1 Rb8 35.Nxb8 Re7 36.Nxc6+ Kc7 37.Rxe7+ Kxc6 38.Rc1+ Diagram

38...Kd6 39.b8Q+ Kxe7 40.Rc7+ Kf6 41.Qf8+ Kg5 42.Rg7+ Kh4 43.Rxg4+ 1-0

(6) Colle,Edgar - O'Hanlon,John [D05]
Nice Nice (9), 1930

1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 c5 4.c3 e6 5.Bd3 Bd6 6.Nbd2 Nbd7 7.0-0 0-0 8.Re1 Re8 9.e4 dxe4 10.Nxe4 Nxe4 11.Bxe4 cxd4 Diagram

12.Bxh7+ Kxh7 13.Ng5+ Kg6 14.h4 Rh8 15.Rxe6+ Nf6 16.h5+ Kh6 17.Rxd6 Qa5 18.Nxf7+ Kh7 19.Ng5+ Kg8 20.Qb3+ 1-0

(7) Lasker,Emanuel - Bauer,Johann Hermann [A03]
Amsterdam Amsterdam (1), 26.08.1889
[notes by Keith Farrell]

1.f4 d5 2.e3 Nf6 3.b3 e6 4.Bb2 Be7 5.Bd3 b6 6.Nf3 Bb7 7.Nc3 Nbd7 8.0-0 0-0 9.Ne2 c5 10.Ng3 Qc7 11.Ne5 Nxe5 12.Bxe5 Qc6 13.Qe2 Diagram

black has to be on the lookout for the sacifice, for there is fireworks in the offing 13...a6 14.Nh5 Nxh5 15.Bxh7+ Kxh7 16.Qxh5+ Kg8 17.Bxg7 Kxg7 18.Qg4+ Kh7 19.Rf3 e5 20.Rh3+ Qh6 21.Rxh6+ Kxh6 22.Qd7 Bf6 23.Qxb7 Kg7 24.Rf1 Rab8 25.Qd7 Rfd8 26.Qg4+ Kf8 27.fxe5 Bg7 28.e6 Rb7 29.Qg6 f6 30.Rxf6+ Bxf6 31.Qxf6+ Ke8 32.Qh8+ Ke7 33.Qg7+ Kxe6 34.Qxb7 Rd6 35.Qxa6 d4 36.exd4 cxd4 37.h4 d3 38.Qxd3 1-0

(8) Farrell,Keith (1230) - Grootheddie,Robert (1200) [C40]
Fisher's Ghost Open 1983 Campbelltown (3), 04.10.1983
[notes by Keith - some are the 'original' note]

ref 277 opp rating 1200 est time control 40/90 7 THEN 20/30 played weekly starting 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5 3.exd5 Qxd5 4.Nc3 Qe6 5.Be2 c6 6.0-0 Bd6 7.Re1 Ne7 8.d4 Nd7?? [8...exd4 or castling - even ... f6 9.Qxd4 0-0 were preferable] 9.Ng5 Qf5 10.Bc4 0-0 11.Bd3 Qf6 12.Nce4 Qg6 13.Nxd6 Qxd6 14.Bxh7+ Diagram

so ok NOT the greek gift - but it shares quite a few similarities - in the the queen (and rook too) can move rapidly to the h-file 14...Kh8 15.Qh5 Nf6 16.Nxf7+ Rxf7 17.Qxf7 Kxh7 18.dxe5 Qd5 19.Qxe7 Nh5 20.Bf4 Bd7 21.Qh4 Qf7 22.e6 Bxe6 23.g4 Bxg4 24.Qxg4 Nxf4 25.Qh4+ Kg8 26.Rad1 Ne6 27.Qg4 Rd8 28.Rxd8+ Nxd8 29.b3 Qd5 30.Re8+ Diagram

at last I activate a Rook off the baseline 30...Kf7 31.Re1 Qa5 32.Qf4+ Kg6 33.Qd6+ Kh7 34.Kf1 Nf7 35.Qf8 Ng5 36.Re7 Qc3 37.Qf5+ Kh6 38.h4 Qh3+ 39.Qxh3 Nxh3 40.Rxb7 Nf4 41.Rxa7 g5 42.Ra6 gxh4 43.Rxc6+ Kg5 44.c3 h3 45.Kg1 Diagram

30 moves later I win - in a relaxed manner is my guess since it is unlikely I was under time-pressure 45...Kh4 46.Kh2 Nh5 47.Rc4+ Kg5 48.Kxh3 Nf4+ 49.Kh2 Kf5 50.a4 Nd5 51.Rc5 Ke6 52.Kg3 Kd6 53.Rc4 Nb6 54.Rd4+ Kc6 55.f3 Nd5 56.Rc4+ Kd6 57.b4 Nb6 58.Rd4+ Kc6 59.a5 Nd5 60.b5+ Kc5 61.a6 Nxc3 62.a7 Nxb5 63.Rd5+ Kxd5 64.a8Q+ Kc5 65.f4 Nc7 66.Qa7+ Kd6 67.Kg4 Ne6 68.f5 Nf8 69.Qd4+ Ke7 70.Qg7+ Ke8 71.f6 Ng6 72.f7+ Ke7 73.f8Q+ Ke6 74.Qf5+ Kd6 75.Qgxg6+ Diagram

black resigns 1-0